Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thai Kwiatkowski vs Giles Hussey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kwiatkowski vs Hussey analysis and find out who is favored!
Thai Kwiatkowski vs Giles Hussey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kwiatkowski 1 - 0 Hussey
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kwiatkowski has won 47.7% of points on his second serve, while Hussey has won 52.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kwiatkowski, in recent form, has won 52.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hussey has won 54.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.81% and 37.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kwiatkowski has saved 58.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hussey has saved 63.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kwiatkowski has won 62.16% of matches played (W/L 46/ 28), with Hussey winning 69.88% (W/L 58/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kwiatkowski has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 148/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Hussey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 87/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Kwiatkowski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22), where as Hussey has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.06% of matches (W/L 54/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kwiatkowski winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kwiatkowski winning 2 and Hussey winning 1. The last match between Kwiatkowski and Hussey was at the Drummondville Challenger, 14-11-2023, First, I.hard with Thai Kwiatkowski getting the victory 7-6(4) 0-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kwiatkowski and Hussey have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kwiatkowski winning 1 times and Hussey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kwiatkowski winning 1, and Hussey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kwiatkowski has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.65 while Hussey has played against players with an average rank of 158.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kwiatkowski has won 34% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hussey has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kwiatkowski has converted 48.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hussey has converted 45.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
271
Rank
181
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
353
Rank
353
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (229-169)
Career Total W/L
64% (145-82)
63% (20-12)
YTD W/L
73% (29-11)
$91,805
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kwiatkowski VS Hussey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Thai Kwiatkowski | Giles Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:15 | 2:15:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (54/98) | 63% (57/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (40/54) | 79% (45/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (22/44) | 53% (18/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (28/91) | 37% (36/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kwiatkowski VS Hussey H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 0-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Giles Hussey
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
36 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thai Kwiatkowski | Giles Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (20/12) | 73% (29/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (48/27) | 68% (65/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (394/331) | 56% (500/387) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 83% (15/3) | 76% (29/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 175 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 114 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:4 | 1:48:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 239.56 | 149.07 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1350/2283) | 66% (1815/2746) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (996/1350) | 66% (1196/1815) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (445/933) | 53% (498/931) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (111/227) | 45% (145/321) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (950/2300) | 44% (1204/2763) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (10/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 78% (28/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (19/31) | 74% (28/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 82% (9/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (3/12) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (26/19) | 82% (28/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (26/7) | 18% (28/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 50% (12/6) |
Thai Kwiatkowski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
7
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Tristan Boyer
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
34%
(
13 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
47%
(
35 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
7
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Andres Andrade
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Bertran
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Giles Hussey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Giles Hussey
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
74%
(
94 of
127)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
9
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
56 of
94)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(6) 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Giles Hussey
87%
(
67 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Marek Gengel
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Robin Bertrand
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Harry Wendelken
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Enzo Wallart
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Giles Hussey
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Kwiatkowski Vs Hussey Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
